![]() A lot of contemporary scholarship in the arts or humanities is not about completely reorienting the discipline, nor is it usually about arguing a thesis that has never been argued before. The question of whether the book breaks new ground does not necessarily refer to some radical or overarching notion of originality in the author’s argument. how well the book covers its topics and whether it breaks new ground" requires your engagement with the book, and can be approached in a variety of ways. the arrangement of the book (chapters, illustrations) and the quality of the scholarly apparatus, such as notes and bibliographies. the appropriateness of the evidence to the topical scope of the book the author’s viewpoint, methodology, or perspective Į. how well the book covers its topic(s) and whether it breaks new ground ĭ. ![]() The basic purpose of a book review is to convey and evaluate the following:Ĭ. Put your name at the very end of the book review text. Adhere to a particular citation style, such as Chicago, MLA, or APA. When writing an academic book review, start with a bibliographic citation of the book you are reviewing. For a detailed guide on writing book reviews in the social sciences, please check the USC Libraries guide to Writing and Organizing Research in the Social Sciences, authored by Dr. ![]() Note: This information is geared toward researchers in the arts and humanities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |